Skip to main content

Remote Not Working, Not Indoor PCB

A remote-control problem was treated as an indoor board failure. The checks showed the signal-receiving path was the problem, which reduced the repair scope.

Case Details

LocationPasir Ris, Singapore
BrandSharp
Unit age7 yrs
ComplaintThe remote stopped controlling the unit, but power at the unit was still on. A board replacement was suggested after a brief visit.
CauseIR receiver path fault causing command signal failure
1

The Assessment

Remote-control faults need the signal path checked first. We split the remote side checks from the main board decision before quoting larger work.

  • Unit power was present and the issue was command response
  • Remote-control pattern did not confirm a full board fault
  • Fault was traced to the signal receiver path
  • Main board replacement was not the first repair path
2

The Diagnosis

The problem was in the IR receiver path, where the unit receives remote commands. The main indoor board was not the first failed item in this case. The symptom looked like a board problem because the remote could not control the unit, but the signal path check narrowed it down.

Repair the signal receiver path issue first, then confirm command response before discussing any wider board replacement.

3

The Outcome

After the signal receiver path was corrected, the remote controlled the unit normally again. The client avoided a larger board replacement.

Timeline

Normal useRemote control response was normal
Fault startUnit stopped responding to remote commands
First adviceMain board replacement was suggested
Snowflake visitIR receiver path fault identified
After correctionRemote control response restored
4

What This Means for You

Remote-control faults can be smaller than a full board replacement.

  • Unit still has power but remote commands do not respond
  • Main board replacement was suggested early
  • No clear signal-path checks were explained

Ask for the remote signal receiver path to be checked first so you do not pay for the wrong part.